|
||
JOHN MORRISON writes a regular column for the Green Page which is prepared by the media group of the Alternative Technology Centre for the Hebden Bridge Times - this month's column (October 2001) was left out by the HBT.
An open letter to Sheila Tordoff of the Hebden Bridge Times Dear Sheila, I was mildly miffed - though not surprised - when you pulled my piece from the Green Page of last week's paper, for criticising the views expressed in Sir Bernard Ingham'scolumn. The Hebden Bridge Times is probably no worse than most local papers. There's little point criticising it for being complaisant and relentlessly parochial; that's what local papers are about. Mention everyone who's been hatched, matched and dispatched’ (make sure to spell their names right) and the job's half done. And as long as I've been living in Hebden Bridge, the paper has been a rich source of anecdotes and (mostly unconscious) humour. I buy it every week; I'm addicted. No, what bugs me is Bernard Ingham. I am genuinely interested to know your justification for running a column by a man who left the town so very many years ago, and who now shows his face only when there's a film crew in tow. Why do you give a (presumably) uncensored platform to a man whose beliefs and opinions are anathema to so many of the people who actually live here? There is a fine line between being thought-provoking, and being gratuitously offensive. It's a line Sir Bernard gleefully tramples over, in hob-nailed boots. In column after column he snipes at the town from his bunker in Purley. He promotes himself shamelessly, as well as those companies in which he has a financial stake. He tells us how we should live our lives. He discounts opinions that differ from his own as bunkum and balderdash. And he does all this in the hectoring tones of the playground bully. In his last column, for example, he reminisced about what life was like before lesbians’, and commented that the town's supposed status as the Lesbian Capital of Great Britain’ does not say much for the men of Hebden Bridge. No doubt he is aware just how offensive these words are... to lesbians and blokes alike. But are you? Reminiscing about the good old days is what we do when we haven’t lived in our home town for half a century. But please let Sir Bernard confine his memories in future to his close friends in Purley, rather than give him any more column inches in which to insult the people who have chosen to live in Hebden Bridge. These are the real Hebden Bridgers now: the ones that stayed when times were hard, and the ones that came when they saw an opportunity. By giving Sir Bernard a soapbox, and denying local people a voice, you are abusing your position of having a virtual monopoly on local news and views. No wonder the Hebden Bridge Times is seen as a joke. The inability to accept any kind of criticism - however well-meant - is the hallmark of the truly mediocre. The recent facelift is just that: a cosmetic improvement. If you were to spend more time making genuine improvements to the paper, and less time running to the company lawyers, the vibrant and creative little town of Hebden Bridge might have the newspaper it deserves. This letter will be published on the Hebden Bridge Web which, in contrast to your paper, provides an uncensored forum for a wide range of opinions. Yours sincerely "A Sideways Look" - the column which did not appear with October's Green Page of the Hebden Bridge Times In one of his recent columns Sir Bernard Ingham fulminates against lesbians, liberals and - bizarrely - trees. He propagates the idea that Hebden Bridge has become the 'Lesbian Capital of Great Britain'. This label, he suggests, "does not say much for the men of Hebden Bridge". In a few ill-chosen words of jaw-dropping crassness, he manages the neat trick of insulting just about everyone in town. Is he really subscribing to the notion that lesbians can be
'cured' by a good seeing-to? On his next visit to Hebden Bridge I suggest he wears a cricket box.
|
||
|